con you help with this forgiveness presentation
March 22, 2021
Behavior Modification – Nursing Writers Hub
March 22, 2021

Andy Grove, one of the
three founders of Intel Corporation, was asked three questions by Peter F.
Drucker in a 1986 interview. The three questions appear below along with Dr.
Grove’s responses.

QUESTION 1

If there were one thing
to tell a young man or woman who starts out with their own new business and
wants to build it, what is the one absolutely essential thing you would tell
them?

If I had one shot at
getting something into a person’s mind or heart in this situation, it would be
the concept of submerging their own self and putting it behind the interests of
the enterprise. They should not put themselves ahead of the enterprise. And I
can’t say that emphatically enough. Whatever problems I have seen all come from
people wanting to succeed personally, wanting to be right personally, wanting
to win an argument personally, wanting an organization change to propel them
ahead personally, without considering what impact that desire or that change
has on the organization.

Particularly when you are in the small boat with a number of other
people—close proximity and pressures are high and tension is high. Getting into
the people’s mind that you won’t get there any faster by positioning yourself
at the bow of the boat; you’ll only get there faster if you row faster and move
the boat forward. If you can get this into the founding people’s hearts and minds,
you have won automatically the majority of the battles that will come up.

The only thing that matters is the enterprise. You cannot succeed
if the enterprise does not succeed. And if the enterprise succeeds, there will
be enough success to go around and you’ll get your share. So, my admonishment
to any person in that situation is, Don’t put your ego ahead of the enterprise,
because you will lose. What is right matters, not who is right.

QUESTION 2

What did you have to
learn to do and what did you have to learn not to do at the beginning, when the
three of you sat down and began to build the company and the business? And then
how did this change once the company was successful and very large?

The job [initially] was
very simple conceptually. You needed to do a certain number of things today, a
certain number of things tomorrow, and a certain number of things by the end of
the month. And unlike in a company like Intel today, where we are very
preoccupied with the process of how to do things, we knew what to do and
somebody went and did it.

This lack of interest in the process of how you are doing things
started to give way to more thought to the [formal] process maybe about three
years into the life of the company. For the first three years, there was no
game plan; people just did things that they were naturally attracted to, and
very rarely did they collide. We only hired people with very specific skills;
there was no training involved. We were concerned with people right from the
very beginning of the company. The nature of the concern was very heavily
skills-oriented and task-oriented, rather than process-oriented or
training-oriented or structure-oriented.

Now, seventeen years later, my personal behavior is substantially
different because the company is substantially bigger, more complex, and
because I am seventeen years older.

The content of what I do now is substantially different. Seventeen
years ago I was buying equipment myself, running experiments, and reducing the
data. I was one step away from silicon wafers and stuff like that at the time.
Today, I am many steps away from that. Today, I deal with abstractions but
still with people. People have been a constant.

I began with an instinctive way of how to hire, manage, and
communicate with a person. Then, I remember two milestones. Intel started in
1968. We became aware of a growing need for some kind of a formal training
process in 1971. The way that came about is that the person who headed our
manufacturing organization had a series of lunches with the production
operators and asked them what their concerns were. After three or four lunches,
he was absolutely astounded—he was expecting to hear complaints about it being
too hot or cold, or perhaps that they wanted music piped in as they worked. But
the predominant complaint that came up during these lunches was that they were
not being trained for their jobs. So, the impetus for formal training at Intel
goes back to these lunches. And that was not in my intuition. We went around to
institute the beginnings of a very sophisticated training program for
operators. And then the question came up, “Should we not do this for managers
also?”

In 1973, supervisors were saying, “you want us to do performance
assessments and other duties; show us how to do them.” The demand for
additional training, management training this time, began again. I was forced
to rethink the intuitive techniques that we had started several years earlier.

I went through a gradual process. Things became more complex. You
go into a new company with everything in your head. I went through a gradual
realization; a shifting of tasks took place gradually. The picture of my own
role emerged relatively early. I was the organizer and taskmaster. People in
the initial group almost immediately gravitated to roles that fit them. The
team built itself up almost. Roles that were needed gravitated to appropriate
team members.

If you don’t think through the roles of the key people very early,
you build up tribes and power struggles in the organization, which in the early
stages has to be deadly. New people, subordinates, had a different way of
operating than me. I had some real conflict with those individuals. They were
not reaching for roles and colliding with the initial group but had a different
way of operating. As a result of insisting that their way of operating prevail
and by trying to exert power with the others, we were led to a power struggle—a
struggle that resulted in our wasting substantial emotional energy. It was a
very early introduction to the responsibilities that I had to deal with,
responsibilities I did not want to deal with but had no choice.

The initial group was very willing to make changes with a little
bit of friction and a little bit of debate. Most of us had hungry minds, the minds
of a student, and the notion of getting into a new area had more attraction
than imposing your views in an old area. And for the same reason we did not
resist going out to the customer.

My role was not so much as “going out” rather as being “major domo”
for people “coming in.” And that started relatively early. Here is a
self-respecting semiconductor-device person [me] setting up tools for
representatives of major corporations whose biggest concerns at that time were
not technical but had to do with the viability of Intel as a company. I started
doing this work almost immediately. Our industry had promised all kinds of
things that it had not delivered upon. So, we had a very skeptical customer
base. So, we adopted as a corporate logo Intel Delivers.

QUESTION 3

How did you go about
developing yourself?

I get my nose into a new
activity; I spend some amount of time on it. I find that I put pressure on my
time. At some point, I find that something has to go. I begin to scan what I
do. I look for opportunities. I look for activities that I participate in that
I could stop participating in. For most of the things that have to go I can
find some substitute arrangement. For example, I changed our management meeting
from once each week to one each two weeks.

In every case, the pressure is around time. I ask, “What am I
doing that I shouldn’t be doing?” I force myself to get overloaded, and then I
look at the whole stack for something to throw out.

I look at what I do. Should I still be doing it? Am I doing it well?
Am I adding enough value to what I am doing? Is it more worthwhile or less
worthwhile than something else? I negotiate with myself. Perhaps what happens
is that I won’t immediately stop something but I start the machinery to stop
within a certain period of time, such as six months.

QUESTIONS

What did Andy Grove do
right as an entrepreneur? How about as an executive once Intel grew into a
complex company? What lessons do you take away from Andy Grove’s experiences as
a cofounder and president of Intel Corporation?

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

 

"Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"

Essay Writing Service
ORDER NOW